ChatGPT at Work: Assessing Your Employment Stability Across Ten Different Contexts
The legal implications of using ChatGPT, among other AI tools, in the workplace remain a moot point. Some businesses agree that AI can accelerate their daily operations. Alternatively, companies like JPMorgan Chase & Co., Samsung, Amazon, and Apple prohibit their workforce from even using ChatGPT.
Whether or not using AI can lead to termination varies case by case. To help you understand the guidelines, let’s discuss how employers generally see these use cases of ChatGPT.
1. Publishing ChatGPT-Generated Articles
Considering the accessibility and sophistication of language models, you might consider publishing AI content. Offloading writing tasks to ChatGPT will boost your output. It only needs seconds to generate a coherent, error-free blog on any given topic.
Although convenient, we advise against submitting AI content. ChatGPT merely scrapes and rephrases information from datasets—its output likely contains plagiarized text. Your employer can fire you for plagiarism if you carelessly use them in your articles.
Exploreresponsible ways of writing with AI instead. ChatGPT streamlines non-writing tasks, like researching topics, editing drafts, and analyzing reader personas.
2. Automating Employee Performance Reviews Through ChatGPT
ChatGPT’s sophisticatednatural language processing (NLP) system understands input and produces corresponding responses. Some employees rely on it for drafting performance reports. They make ChatGPT write customized reviews by submitting their subordinates’ key performance indicators (KPIs).
However, using ChatGPT this way is deceitful—it doesn’t have enough context to assess your employees accurately. You’ll definitely get fired for submitting erroneous ratings. Workers might even file lawsuits against you depending on the gravity of the situation.
3. Asking ChatGPT to Draft Legal Documents and Contracts
Title: Craft Your Content Uniquely with OpenAI’s Tailored GPT